First conversation
What you are looking for, and whether this fits.
Clinical, counselling, educational, forensic, health, occupational, sport and exercise psychologist all require statutory registration, and misuse is a criminal offence. The word psychologist by itself is not protected at all. Worth knowing before you choose anyone.
The title question applies to everyone offering this work, so it goes before anything we say about ourselves.
What is protected, what is not, and how to verify it in a minute.
See the programWhat stays between us, and the circumstances where it cannot.
See the programPsychological work agreed in scope and in fee basis before it begins.
See the programCoaching is not therapy, and a crisis needs a different service.
See the programExplain the title landscape so a client can check anyone including us, set out the limits of confidentiality before any substantive work rather than when they bite, agree scope and fees in writing, and refer where clinical input is what is actually needed.
What you are looking for, and whether this fits.
Checkable, by you, on a public register.
Including its limits, before you share.
In writing, before work begins.
Fees are in pounds sterling and the basis on which they are charged is stated before work begins.
Whether this is the right kind of help at all.
Scope and fee basis agreed before anything starts.
Absent on purpose, not by oversight.
Every engagement is quoted after a free consultation. No subscription.
ROB ARCHER PSYCHOLOGY LTD was incorporated in England and Wales on 13 August 2013 under company number 08648198, with its registered office at 23 Villiers Gardens in London, and has had the same director throughout. Its registered activity is other professional, scientific and technical activities, which is a generic classification and specifies no speciality.
The most useful thing a page like this can do is explain something that applies to every practitioner rather than advertise one. In the United Kingdom a defined list of psychology titles is protected by law and may be used only by someone on the statutory register: practitioner psychologist, registered psychologist, and the clinical, counselling, educational, forensic, health, occupational and sport and exercise variants. Using one of those without registration is a criminal offence. The bare word psychologist, however, is not protected, and anybody may lawfully use it. Psychotherapist and counsellor are not protected either, though accredited voluntary registers exist. A designation from a professional body is not statutory regulation and should not be read as one. None of this means an unregistered practitioner is unsuitable, and plenty of valuable work is done by people using unprotected titles. What it means is that a title on a website establishes much less than readers assume, and the only check that settles anything is to note the exact wording and look it up on the relevant public register. It takes about a minute. The second thing worth saying early is that confidentiality in this work is not absolute, and its limits get explained before anything substantive rather than at the moment they operate.
Practitioner psychologist and registered psychologist, together with the specific titles for clinical, counselling, educational, forensic, health, occupational, and sport and exercise psychology. Those may be used only by someone registered with the statutory regulator, and using one without registration is a criminal offence. They are protected because each corresponds to a defined route of training and supervised practice.
No, and this surprises most people. The bare word is not protected and anybody may lawfully use it. The protection attaches to the compound titles rather than to the word alone. That does not mean someone using the unqualified term is unsuitable, but it does mean the word by itself establishes nothing, and it is the reason the useful question is which exact title is being used.
Neither is protected by statute. There are accredited voluntary registers for both, and membership of one tells you something real about training and accountability, but it is not the same as statutory registration and should not be presented as though it were. Likewise a designation conferred by a professional body is a professional body's designation, not regulation.
Note the exact title they use, then search the relevant public register for their name. If they use a protected title they should appear on the statutory register; if they use a voluntary register's designation, check that register. It takes a minute and it is the only verification that establishes anything. Ask us the same question: the registration held by this practice is on the legal page rather than implied.
Yes, with limits, and the limits are explained before any substantive work rather than when they operate. They include a serious risk of harm to you or to another person, concerns about the safety of a child or an adult at risk, and disclosure required by a court or by law. This is not the same as a lawyer's privilege, which is close to absolute, and the difference is worth understanding before deciding what to share.
This is not a crisis service and the contact form is not monitored continuously. If there is a risk to life, contact the emergency services or an urgent mental health service. That is a genuinely better route and not a brush-off: a practice working by appointment cannot provide the response an urgent situation needs, and pretending otherwise would be the dangerous thing to do.
A first conversation, with no obligation.